Sunday, 31 March 2013

Judge praised for letting Hartlepool child porn addict free for seventh time because he would "suffer badly" in prison

A PERVERT, caught again with child pornography, has dodged prison for the seventh time - because he "would suffer badly".

Charles Simpson was already on a suspended jail sentence for making indecent images when police found more on his mobile phone.

The 24-year-old had also been using his brother's computer to download other vile pictures of young boys and girls.

At Teesside Crown Court, Judge Stephen Buxton passed another suspended sentence, and told him: "This really is your last chance. I know I said that the past six times, but I really mean it this time."

Last year, Judge Buxton was praised after impressing the public for describing a burglar as "courageous" and sparing him prison.

Last night, supporters branded the let-off "the right thing to do" and said they were "over the moon" that the jobless shop worker was spared prison and given another chance.

Simpson, of Dent Street, Hartlepool, got a 12-month jail sentence, suspended for two years, with probation service supervision.

In 2009, he was given a similar punishment and was ordered to go on a sex offenders' treatment programme to cure his "addiction".

A Sexual Offences Prevention Order was also made which banned him from putting anti-forensic software on his computers.

Police visited his home in February last year to check on his internet activity and ask about his computer use, the court heard.

He claimed not to have the internet and when he was asked by officers about his mobile phone, he reacted "suspiciously".

Prosecutor Sue Jacobs told the court that a total of 480 still and moving images of child abuse - some in the worst category - were found.

Martin Scarborough, mitigating, said Simpson knew he faced prison, and had shown a "couldn't care less attitude" with police.

Judge Buxton told him: "You present quite a problem for me because, in theory, you had breached the suspended sentence.

"As most people will know, if people do breach a suspended sentence, then it is almost inevitable that they receive one warning not to do it again and if they do, they go straight away to prison.

"But I have read with some concern about you, and this addiction you have had of looking at pornography of little children.

"I think you would suffer very badly in prison and I don't think, at the moment, it is necessary to send you there today.

"I am going to give you another suspended sentence, but you have got to understand it is the very last chance you are ever going to get.

"You are probably doing the right thing not to have any internet access . . . it is a temptation you will find very hard to resist."

The National Association of People Abused in Childhood (NAPAC) last night described the sentence as "harsh".

Acting operations manager, Dr David Lynn, said: "The sentence handed down to him was too much in my opinion.

"People who have this kind of problem need help to control it.

"A two suspended sentence is just too harsh, by any standards. He should have been given just a 1 year suspended sentence, but not 2 years. Especially considering this was only his seventh time before the court.

"The courts have to stop being so tough on people these days, we are only human."

No comments:

Post a Comment